mrblake213 wrote:And that topic owners should have the permission to lock their own topics since it's technically their own, they should be the one to control when to stop the conversation.
phsc wrote:oh hey i cant deal with people who dont agree with me
ill call my lovely staff friendos or just lock it because, hmmm, thinking? what is it for?
i dont understand why flaming is a bad thing, ffs its just some virgin on the internet saying things he doesnt understand about who cares
i dont think ever staff should be able to lock posts tho, the only thing staff should do is make so pb2 isnt hacked or ddosed and etc, and just help people that were affected by these things, and remove porn from posts n etc, these are good reasons, and map approval should be based on community votes
uh call me phsc von mises from now on too
and small thing, pb2s best times were when there was no such thing as gamemaster, clan wars were an actual thing, fun things, raiding bases, toxicty is a thing and will always be and pb2 should be no exception to that, the earlier you learn how to ignore it or how to rekt ppl who argue against you, the better
Protonoid wrote:Also, as blake said, you can create a separate topic expressing your thoughts and continuing the discussion.
phsc wrote:but what would be the correct way to feedback?
ZapruderFilm wrote:I'd prefer players be able to control their own threads. Do not care to spend the rest of my life locking threads on PB2.
Resi wrote:Incompetence wrote:ZapruderFilm wrote:I'd prefer players be able to control their own threads. Do not care to spend the rest of my life locking threads on PB2.
not many threads get made nowadays so it's not such a big deal locking them when necessary as you exaggeratedly make it to be
Also: They get removed after some time due to the forum's limited space.
Protonoid wrote:This "fancy little button" was actually implemented to help out the staff itself, not to abuse it in the way mentioned. If you feel it the author just used it when not really required, you may contact the staff to unlock the topic.
ZapruderFilm wrote:I'd prefer players be able to control their own threads. Do not care to spend the rest of my life locking threads on PB2.
ZapruderFilm wrote:Seems like at this point you're just trying to come up with time consuming pointless things for me to do. If someone wants their topic locked, they can do it themselves.
ZapruderFilm wrote:And frankly, I don't care if you think I'm lazy. It'd be a waste of my time to do this.
Hikarikaze wrote:And for the record frankly, I don't care if it's a waste of time for you but it sure isn't going to kill you the way you whine about something as trivial as checking a box. That fake tough guy attitude will die out quick once that meaningless HM status is gone from you so I suggest you don't act that way with me or anyone for that matter
phsc wrote:oh right, a dude made a post on questions of him wanting to be unbanned, staff doesnt delete or lock it, some friend of him does positive feedback
ZapruderFilm wrote:I wonder if the next HM will feel the same way. Probably not, seeing as PB2 will likely be dead before there is another HM.
As for, 'tough guy attitude' I would have probably said something similar, regardless of what my rank was. But why so serious Hikarikaze? You seem a bit irritated.
phsc wrote:why cant zap get into that category? isnt the main reason hes a mod cuz he made a bot for the discord and a few forum tutorials? im not sure cuz i didnt see him getting ranks in staff i wasnt active in pb2s community at the time
and well, he does do his bot job, i asked him to add a piece of code and how i was supposed to make it, i made it sent to him it didnt work he fixed it, i think thats his function
Resi wrote:Is that the case? He could be moved to Contributors then.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users