reking bad

Share your PB2-related Still Art here!

reking bad

Postby iterroronly » 9 June 2016, 19:53


Spoiler: Show More


fu**ed up during the saving... lol.. now its jpeg. enjoy m8!!
R8!!!!!!!!
Last edited by iterroronly on 9 June 2016, 20:52, edited 6 times in total.

iterroronly
Recruit
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 14 May 2016, 21:57

Re: reking bad (18+!!) (eric gurt face reveal!!) (jumpscares

Postby mrblake213 » 10 June 2016, 05:15

oh shit
eric gurt lookz d0p3.
omggggggggg
User avatar
mrblake213
Proxy [700]
 
Posts: 773
Joined: 16 July 2013, 10:25
Location: Philippines

Re: reking bad (18+!!) (eric gurt face reveal!!) (jumpscares

Postby Purple Monster » 10 June 2016, 13:06

mg

dis is so hawt

but gurt luks hotter sorry fam

7/9

Purple Monster
Recruit
 
Posts: 24
Joined: 13 March 2016, 12:22

Re: reking bad

Postby Dandamage » 10 June 2016, 20:27

Nice design. Looks like something Gurt would draw for PB2 (compliment).
User avatar
Dandamage
Android T-01187 [200]
 
Posts: 234
Joined: 15 August 2015, 15:01
Location: dandamage

Re: reking bad

Postby wreak » 12 June 2016, 22:41

erm meh god m8, dat look so kewl! 10/10
User avatar
wreak
Civil Security Boss [500]
 
Posts: 577
Joined: 23 January 2015, 02:01

Re: reking bad

Postby Cpt Epsilon Tex » 13 June 2016, 06:38

Reminds me of LSAT LMG somehow tbh..
User avatar
Cpt Epsilon Tex
Usurpation Soldier [50]
 
Posts: 56
Joined: 8 February 2014, 14:28
Location: The sniper's sight... The first kill tonight.

Re: reking bad

Postby Green eyed Demon » 13 June 2016, 17:45

It's decent,congratz

Green eyed Demon
 

Re: reking bad

Postby Hikarikaze » 13 June 2016, 18:48



Congratulations, you made an average looking thing. At least it doesn't look bad.
User avatar
Hikarikaze
Noir Lime [600]
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 January 2014, 02:05
Location: Somewhere, just not here

Re: reking bad

Postby bitmix » 18 June 2016, 20:37

Hikarikaze wrote:

Congratulations, you made an average looking thing. At least it doesn't look bad.

u cant do better m8

bitmix
Cyber Grub [25]
 
Posts: 32
Joined: 31 May 2016, 21:32

Re: reking bad

Postby Incompetence » 20 June 2016, 18:22

looks neat, dont like the colors though

bitmix wrote:
Hikarikaze wrote:Congratulations, you made an average looking thing. At least it doesn't look bad.

u cant do better m8

lmfao you must be joking
User avatar
Incompetence
Civil Security Heavy [300]
 
Posts: 331
Joined: 3 February 2016, 03:55
Location: Definitely not behind you

Re: reking bad

Postby Sniper J » 21 June 2016, 00:52

it looks yucky without the stock

Sniper J
Advanced Usurpation Soldier [150]
 
Posts: 168
Joined: 7 December 2014, 03:01
Location: United States

Re: reking bad

Postby Hikarikaze » 22 June 2016, 02:35

bitmix wrote:u cant do better m8



Build a wall with your salt and get over it

Also, there's barely any valid way that this would even work properly. http://prntscr.com/bjd84f

EP is about as long as the magazine itself, which is impractical. I suggest you pay attention to detail more because minor mistakes like these kill drawings entirely sometimes.

How much time do you even spend on these? Looks like something made in 3 minutes.
User avatar
Hikarikaze
Noir Lime [600]
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 January 2014, 02:05
Location: Somewhere, just not here

Re: reking bad

Postby Roxxar » 22 June 2016, 06:35

Hikarikaze wrote:Also, there's barely any valid way that this would even work properly. http://prntscr.com/bjd84f

EP is about as long as the magazine itself, which is impractical. I suggest you pay attention to detail more because minor mistakes like these kill drawings entirely sometimes.

How much time do you even spend on these? Looks like something made in 3 minutes.

to be fair, this is in a game where a gun has a magazine but infinite ammo (CS-RC), a gun without a handle/thickest handle ever (C-01r), a gun with a brick for a handle that shoots infinite green nukes (BNG), and MULTIPLE guns without a stock and/or proper weight distribution (a heavy railgun is held in the same way you hold the small ray rifle)
User avatar
Roxxar
Civil Security Lite [100]
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 16 July 2013, 19:47
Location: Trash Can

Re: reking bad

Postby Hikarikaze » 22 June 2016, 06:45

Roxxar wrote:to be fair, this is in a game where a gun has a magazine but infinite ammo (CS-RC), a gun without a handle/thickest handle ever (C-01r), a gun with a brick for a handle that shoots infinite green nukes (BNG), and MULTIPLE guns without a stock and/or proper weight distribution (a heavy railgun is held in the same way you hold the small ray rifle)

Fair point but it's really just nitpicking/personal preference. I prefer art that show at least some degree of realism; even some plausible explanation involving pseudoscience would work.

I see where you're coming from though.
User avatar
Hikarikaze
Noir Lime [600]
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 January 2014, 02:05
Location: Somewhere, just not here

Re: reking bad

Postby bitmix » 22 June 2016, 16:45

you are just jealous, himkarikaze. this rifle is sick, eric would buy it for real money to use it in pb2.5

bitmix
Cyber Grub [25]
 
Posts: 32
Joined: 31 May 2016, 21:32

Re: reking bad

Postby Roxxar » 22 June 2016, 18:53

bitmix wrote:you are just jealous, himkarikaze. this rifle is sick, eric would buy it for real money to use it in pb2.5

to be fair, iirc hikari made some good stuff in the past and he just be trying to give constructive criticism (unlike 90% of the commends nowadays) to help improve the proportions/features on future works
User avatar
Roxxar
Civil Security Lite [100]
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 16 July 2013, 19:47
Location: Trash Can

Re: reking bad

Postby bitmix » 22 June 2016, 19:10

Roxxar wrote:
bitmix wrote:you are just jealous, himkarikaze. this rifle is sick, eric would buy it for real money to use it in pb2.5

to be fair, iirc hikari made some good stuff in the past and he just be trying to give constructive criticism (unlike 90% of the commends nowadays) to help improve the proportions/features on future works

Hikarikaze wrote:

Congratulations, you made an average looking thing. At least it doesn't look bad.

her first comment doesnt look like constructive criticism. what she said sounded really arrogantly. i just got a little bit angry because of that, sorry

bitmix
Cyber Grub [25]
 
Posts: 32
Joined: 31 May 2016, 21:32

Re: reking bad

Postby Roxxar » 22 June 2016, 19:31

bitmix wrote:her first comment doesnt look like constructive criticism. what she said sounded really arrogantly. i just got a little bit angry because of that, sorry

you're correct, i dont think it's constructive criticism as well but later on i believe it's safe to assume that she did make a decent comment with good intention afterwards
User avatar
Roxxar
Civil Security Lite [100]
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 16 July 2013, 19:47
Location: Trash Can

Re: reking bad

Postby Hikarikaze » 22 June 2016, 20:06

Roxxar wrote:
bitmix wrote:her first comment doesnt look like constructive criticism. what she said sounded really arrogantly. i just got a little bit angry because of that, sorry

you're correct, i dont think it's constructive criticism as well but later on i believe it's safe to assume that she did make a decent comment with good intention afterwards

I did say that it didn't look bad in my original comment. Saying that "I'm jealous" or something when I showed some level of praise is completely unwarranted and a bad move.
User avatar
Hikarikaze
Noir Lime [600]
 
Posts: 694
Joined: 24 January 2014, 02:05
Location: Somewhere, just not here

Re: reking bad

Postby Zufix » 30 June 2016, 13:44

Very noice. 10/10 c:
User avatar
Zufix
Recruit
 
Posts: 22
Joined: 27 May 2016, 17:11


Return to Still Art

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users



cron