Krutz wrote:The concept of the default ping limit (180 i think) in ranked matches should be abolished; however, those who host a match should be able to determine the predestined ping limit for the match as desired
FRC10 wrote:2) A player can increase the ping but no one must be allowed to vote to reduce the ping while playing in game. In fact, lowering the ping is an absurd idea which enables morons to join a match just to change the ping to something like 40 or maybe 10, instantly kicking all players out of the map and ruining all the fun.
Silent Aurora wrote: Im going to disagree with you there. Users should still have the option to reduce ping limit in-game, maybe they want to play with people that have similar ping to them or don't want laggers to join. They should still have that freedom of choice. Its a lot better than having a default ping limt.
Silent Aurora wrote:Not sure if you understand the ping limit but you need to get the majority vote to change it. There might be a match of 6 people and perhaps 2 trolls join just to lower ping limit for the lols, Im sure the 6 people in that match aren't stupid to allow that. So that would be +2 -4 and the ping limit doesn't change.
Silent Aurora wrote:This isnt even a huge issue since I am in-game most of the time and dont see people abusing the ping limit as much as kicking.
FRC10 wrote:If they wanna play with low or similar ping users , they are free to create the match with desired ping. I mean who stops them to do it . I dont get the point that people start reducing the ping in game while others are playing.
My Simple advice : Leave the match and create a new one for themselves or likes of them.
FRC10 wrote:Well, I do understand ping system. Let me throw an exmaple here : The case u mentioned might be vice-versa. Think about it as over the past few months saw an increase in number of trolls. Correct me if I am wrong.
FRC10]Maybe u are not much active in pb2 game anymore.[/quote]
According to my account statistics, I have done 115+ hours in-game, for the past 3 weeks, that's about 5 hours per day, so I am active in pb2.
[quote="FRC10 wrote:I have seen it and met a bunch of idiots who join the match and change the ping to kick players out of the map. Like if I create a match with ping value of 1000 . People join the match and start playing. But when I kill them, they start calling me lagger and suddenly all of the morons go for voting to lower the ping to 200 or 250 as a result of which I get booted out of the map. My activity has dropped due to this fact.
I am going to change the way PB2 looks and works for better than ever.
Silent Aurora wrote: Why go through all the trouble of creating a whole new match and then wait for it to be full again over 1-2 laggers? Ping limit can just do that. The laggers can simply create a new match if they get booted. That's why people mostly put in the ping limit.
Silent Aurora wrote:Yeah and all it takes is a screenshot + report to a staff member and those trolls will disappear.
Silent Aurora wrote:How consistent was that? Also if people didn't want to play with a lagger then it's their choice, can't force them.
Silent Aurora wrote:According to my account statistics, I have done 115+ hours in-game, for the past 3 weeks, that's about 5 hours per day, so I am active in pb2.
wreak wrote:Ping is a problem to me since my earliest presence in pb2. The implanted ping default system was good in my opinion at first but very shortly after I had serious issues with it. Many people I know couldn't play the game removing the fun. I don't think it is needed since we already have custom custom ping limits and private matches to not forcefully nullify certain players.
Kromrix wrote:Why not look back at our history? Think, when was PB2 the most active and enjoyable? 2012-13 is probably the most common answer, so why not make the new ping limit system implementing what was used during that time period? I'm not saying make it exactly the same as that, because even then there were flaws, but if you use that as your base, I'm sure the product will be great, theoretically.
Remember, the only reason PB2 became less enjoyable is because they changed the game.
Of course, you'll need either people who actually remember what it was like, videos such as the ones on YouTube, or possibly looking into the previous system, if possible.
FRC10 wrote:Aurora,you are advocating the rights of low ping users even though you are aware of the fact that they can play in ranked matches
Silent Aurora wrote: The only reason why theres unranked/ranked was to split the laggers and low ping users DUE to the ping limit.
Silent Aurora wrote: Now, I know they can play ranked but that doesn't mean their ability to reduce ping should be taken away. There are still some use to it. I am against the default (180) ping limt, but I wouldn't want the ability to reduce it be taken away.
Thundrex wrote:I know I am going to get anally annihilate, but:
This "Revivalist" thing is kind of pathetic. You are trying to revive a flash game that never really died (although it is almost there). PB2 will be trashed because Eric is working on an updated version. Then what will you "Revivalists" do? Revive a brand new overhaul of this flash game?
This group or clan or whatever is actually pretty cringe-worthy.
Thundrex wrote:Silent Aurora wrote:This has nothing to do with the current topic, please don't freepost. Post your rants to someone who cares in PM.
It had plenty to do with the topic. I was replying with what I think of the Revivalists. This thread is about the Revivalists. Check your privilege.
FRC10 wrote:Power to lower the ping should be wiped out for the community as a whole regardless of who they are ...low ping users or laggers. Will u enlighten me about "some use to it"?
FRC10 wrote:My last question : when would I be able to play in ranked matches? huh...do u have an answer?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]